Dig/No Dig Trial

Dig/No Dig Trial 2013-2024

This trial is to compare growth of the same vegetables in a dig bed and a no dig bed, with all harvests recorded. It began in 2007 until 2012 at Lower Farm, 6 miles from Homeacres. At both Lower Farm and Homeacres, the area trialled was and is 7.5 m²/80 ft.² for each of the dig and no dig beds.

See this page for 2013-2018 cropping and results.

2024

2024 harvests were 88.54kg dig, and 99.45kg no dig.

The chart below shows harvests from the two Homeacres beds in the 12 years 2013–2024.

12 year totals are 1120.72kg dig, and 1268.92kg no dig - yearly average 93.40kg dig, 105.74kg no dig.

Same amount of compost for each bed.

2023

The chart below shows harvests from the two Homeacres beds in the 11 years 2013-2023.

2023 harvests were 86.08kg dig, and 102.34 no dig.

2022 harvests were 91.17kg dig, and 113.62kg no dig

11 year totals are 1032.18kg dig, and 1169.47kg no dig. Same amount of compost for each bed.

‍

‍

The weather in 2023 was favourable to growth, except for one very dry period in the first three weeks of June. I water by hand and we kept plants growing but potatoes suffered in particular. The warmth was good however, and then during the summer there was plenty of rain, with reasonable warmth - and autumn continued in the same vein.

The dig bed struggled with onions, celery in particular. Genberally we saw as before, plants starting more slowly, leaves looking less glossy.

On 1st December I dug again for the 12th December consecutive. Same compost for each bed, was from the Daleks. Average age 8 months, had red worms!

‍

Anthony Chandler from Liverpool sent these photos of Carrot Man. The first (smiling) is No Dig, and the second (frowning) is Dig. Anthony wrote:

Notice the distinct difference between the two, he’s depressed in a dug state and happy in a No Dig state. I’m sure this is absolute ‘scientific’ proof that if you want happy carrots they must be No Dig ;)

Scientific proof for sure!

‍

2022

A productive year, as long as we watered during the very dry summer. The final three months September to November were the best of the year for new growth, thanks to regular rain and higher than average temperatures. That boosted all the second plantings.

The overwintered broad beans, which you can see in a photo below, gave some nice bean top harvests on 10th March, with 18% more on the no dig bed. Then we planted on 16th March.

‍

‍

Spring was warmer than usual with no significant frosts, and after 1st May, there was no more frost which meant bigger potatoes. Two noticeable relative failures on the dig bed were onions and peas. Last year, the onions grew fine on the dig bed, even if better on no dig.

Sometimes these abnormalities are very striking, and always in the dig soil. Another failure later on was celeriac, which declined to grow on the dig bed.

As soon as space appears, I pop in new transplants through the summer. There is no rotation plan, and often I do it by eye, where I see sufficient space for the new planting to develop mature.

One problem with digging, which I do not see mentioned often, is how you need empty soil to do it. In this trial, it means always that we have to clear the kale in early December from both beds, to have the equivalence, and to be able to dig one of them. It frustrates me because the kale is often cropping really well at this point. It certainly was this year.

‍

Once again, after digging the one bed we transplanted broad beans. This year, because of the extremely cold weather coming, we covered beds with thermacrop.

‍

2021

Photos of preparing beds December 2020, then plantings and cropping 2021

‍

The calico cotton strips decomposed hardly at all in the dug soil, suggesting a lack of biological activity. In the surface of the no dig bed they decomposed rapidly, but this does not tell us a huge amount about the soil below because most of the cotton was in the new compost. Jane did another trial in starting October 2021, results to follow.

Above are the first plantings of 2021, whose harvests you can see in the first table below. The next gallery of photographs are second plantings which we put in from mid-June until mid-July, and there were even third plantings of fennel between cucumbers, and Green Frills mustard after the 2nd crop of carrots.

‍

‍

And then I introduced a difference, new plantings in December, straight after the digging and mulching! Compare the second and third photos below to see how much growth happened during December, the time normally of dormancy but this year was unusually mild with the average temperature almost entirely above freezing, and some days above 10C/50F

‍

Trial beds' harvests (1.5 x 5 m)

There are charts below, and analysis of the data by a statistician.

This link takes you to the 2019 study of each bed’s soil microbiology.

This is the latest infographic, by Soul Farm UK:

2020

We had a warm, dry spring, a fairly warm summer with some rain, a sunny September then wet in early October. A good year for growing. First plantings were on 13th March, then as usual we laid a fleece cover directly on top.

First harvests were radish and turnip in April, then spinach and lettuce, and cabbage soon after.

‍

Early summer sees frantic replanting, as soon as harvests are finished of the first plantings. Cucumbers followed spinach and cabbage, kale followed carrots. The last potato harvest in late June freed space for leeks, celery and beetroot. Peas continued until 10th July.

Pushing over onion leaves, as in the photo below, serves to ensure thinner necks and better storage of bulbs. They are multisown Sturon and gave 11kg/24lb onions from 14 multisown blocks, sown 7th February and germinated on the windowsill.

Harvests of the first plantings were 46.4kg/93lb from the dig bed, and 52.4kg/105lb from the no dig bed. This shows how you need less compost with no dig, for a similar result. In this case both beds had the same amount of compost, for 12% more harvest without digging.

As in most years previously, growth in late summer and autumn tended to be more equal. Or look more equal, except for the kale. Harvests continue to be higher from the no dig bed. Harvests of second plantings to end August were 13kg dig, and 16kg no dig.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

2019

For the seventh time, I dug the dig bed in December and incorporated two large barrows of compost, then simply spread the same on top of no dig.

The compost was 50% horse manure (6-10 months old, from the hotbed of last spring), 25% homemade and 25% mushroom compost/

On 1st April we pulled back the fleece to hoe the dig bed (many tiny weeds) and check progress. All plants sown and planted at the same time.

As last spring (see below), there are problems with the brassicas, beetroot and spinach of dig. Since spring 2018, the dig bed’s growth is weaker than it had been in earlier years, after I first dug the soil from pasture in December 2012.  Yields 2013-17 were just a few % lower but last year was 24% lower, see below.
In the other trial we fork beds and apply compost on top. That reduces yields by less than this method.

By 12th June there is strong growth on both beds, except for dig’s spinach and beetroot. Most harvests are slightly higher on no dig, except for potatoes. Carrots are struggling on both beds and I am unsure why.

Through late summer and autumn, new plantings on the dig bed are stronger than in the spring. Notably the kale. However most harvests continue to be slightly heavier from the no dig bed.

In early December 2019 I cleared the final harvests, the set to and dug the dig bed again, for the eighth time. I spread 1.7 wheelbarrows of nine month old homemade compost on both beds (in trenches of dig), and a little rockdust on each.

Harvest table for 2019.

‍

Data analysis by Thibaut Olivier

Given the interest in the statistical analysis of the data generated from your dig/no dig trials, I used my scientific background to carried out some analyses and tried to extract as much conclusions as possible from the data you kindly provide us on your website.

For these analyses, I considered that: no soil bias and no plant outliers were present in the datasets. I also considered that for each year the same varieties were used and that the same surface was allocated for each vegetable type.

Indeed, in terms of methodology, as one of your Youtube followers already suggested, the fact that you apparently replicate your bed preparation types at the same place each year (no rotation) can indeed induce biases due to soil heterogeneity. Also, since the areas and numbers of plant individuals used are rather small in each statistical object, the data may be influence by outliers (data that differs significantly and abnormally from other observations in the same statistical object). We can indeed imagine that one of the plants in one statistical object does not thrive well (because of localised pest/disease or germination problem) and thus leads to an underestimation. Ideally, with such small plots, vegetable weights should be taken one plant at a time to allow detecting outliers and count the number of plants. It is of course a lot of work and not always possible. Another issue is the fact that not all year modality levels (2014, 2015, 2016…) refer to the same vegetable types and probably not to the same production surface for each type of vegetable (although I guess that most of the time it is the case). It is thus difficult to understand if the weights measured (in kg) can be considered as yield (kg/m²) and compared from one year to another for a given vegetable type. Also, variety names are not always mentioned in the datasets so it is sometimes difficult to figure out if the comparisons are possible (“carrot” vs “Carrot Nantes”; “Kale” vs “Kale Cavolo Nero” …).

On the other hand, I only analysed the “No Dig Trial 2013-2019” and the “three strip trial 2014-2019” datasets since I had the impression that, in the “lower farm” dataset, not all data were available on your website.

The datasets were analysed using linear models and the software “R” dedicated to statistical analyses.

Results:

In overall terms, no significant differences were found between “dig” and “no dig” levels in both analysed trials considering all vegetable types and all years (P>0.05).

Concerning the “No Dig Trial 2013-2019”:

Comparing “dig” and “no dig” levels, one vegetable type at a time, a significant difference was found for spinach (P=0.0338) and highly significant differences were found for kale (P=0.00726) and kaibroc (P=0.00123). In all these three latter significant differences, the “no dig” level showed greater weights.

Year comparisons showed that weights measured in 2017 was significantly different from those of years 2013 (P=0.0128) and 2018 (P=0.0275). But these results should be interpreted with caution (cf. remarks made here before).

Concerning the “Three Strip Trial 2014-2019”:

No significant differences were found between “dig compost”, “no dig compost” and “no dig manure” modalities (P>0.05) considering the whole dataset.

Comparing “dig – compost” and “no dig – compost” levels, one vegetable type at a time, significant differences were found for squashes (P=0.044) as well as “winter salads, spinach” (P=0.02), highly significant difference was found for parsnips (P=0.00938) and very highly significantly difference for lettuces (P=2.63e-05). In all these four differences, the “no dig” level showed greater weights.

Year comparisons showed that weights of 2014 was very highly significantly lower than those measured in years 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (P<0.001). Weights of 2015 were significantly and very highly significantly different from those of 2018 (P=0.021) and 2017 (P<0.01) respectively. Weights of 2017 were very significantly and very highly significantly greater than those of 2018 (P=0.008) and 2016 (P<0.001) respectively. But these results should be interpreted with caution (cf. remarks made here before).

Conclusions:

In overall, no significant differences of weights were found between “dig” and “no dig” levels in both analysed trials. Nevertheless, some vegetable types showed significant to very highly significant weight differences between these two levels. These significant differences were always due to greater weights in the “no dig” level. However, no similar vegetable type was found highlighted in both datasets (kale, parsnips, lettuce and spinach). Kaibrocs and squashes being only present in one trial, the significant difference found in their weights could not be further investigated.